Sun Control and Daylighting Options in a High-Rise Office Building
| Date Published |
02/1985
|
|---|---|
| Publication Type | Journal Article
|
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| DOI |
10.1016/0378-7788(85)90010-6
|
| LBL Report Number |
LBL-12298
|
| Abstract |
The DOE-2 building energy analysis computer program has been used to study the life-cycle cost and annual energy use for a wide range of glazing and sun-control options in a 25-story office building with 50% glazing. Four climates in the U.S. have been analyzed: Miami, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., and Chicago. The impact of daylighting in the perimeter zones for the various sun-control options has also been investigated. Double glazing was found t o have little effect on energy use in Miami and Los Angeles, but reduced energy use 11 - 23% in Washington, D.C., and 16 - 32% in Chicago. Daylighting reduced energy use 10 - 22% and had a simple payback period of 3.7 - 8.9 years depending on climate and type of fenestration. Of the alternatives considered, the lowest life-cycle cost and energy use were obtained with daylighting coupled with clear glazing and exterior sun-control blinds. |
| Journal |
Energy and Buildings
|
| Volume |
8
|
| Year of Publication |
1985
|
| Issue |
1
|
| Number |
1
|
| Pagination |
1-13
|
| Custom 1 |
<p>Windows and Daylighting Group</p>
|
| Keywords | |
| Organizations | |
| Research Areas | |
| File(s) | |
| Download citation | Google Scholar | DOI | BibTeX | Endnote tagged | RIS |