%0 Journal Article
%K Comparison
%K Energy
%K Transportation
%K USA
%K Standards
%K Efficiency
%K Calibration
%K Ablation
%K Laser
%K Laser ablation
%K Laser ablation
%K Analysis
%K Applications
%K State
%K Time
%K Ca
%K E
%K Fractionation
%K Glass
%K Glasses
%K Icp-ms
%K Icp-ms
%K Icp-ms
%K Liquid
%K Matrix
%K Nebulization
%K Sample
%K Chemical analysis
%K Chemical analysis
%K Lasers
%K Ratio
%K Science
%K Crater
%K England
%K Excimer
%K Linear
%K Volume
%K Interference
%K Mixture
%K 266 nm
%K Energies
%K Nm
%K 213 nm
%K Ablation icp-ms
%K Laser ablation icp-ms
%K Laser ablation icp-ms
%K Nist
%K Nist glass
%K Standard
%K Wavelength
%K 193 nm
%K Arf
%K Bond
%K Crater geometry
%K Depth
%K Geometry
%K M
%K Microanalysis
%K Microprobe
%K Ms
%K Nd
%K Penetration
%K Penetration-depth
%K Plasma-mass spectrometry
%K Transport efficiency
%K Wavelengths
%K White-light
%K Yag
%A Jhanis J Gonzalez
%A Xianglei Mao
%A John Roy
%A Samuel S Mao
%A Richard E Russo
%B Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
%D 2002
%F Laser
%G eng
%N 9
%P 1108-1113
%R 10.1039/B202122F
%T Comparison of 193, 213 and 266 nm laser ablation ICP-MS
%V 17
%2 LBNL-51125
%! J. Anal. At. Spectrom.