TY - JOUR AU - Jérôme Le Dréau AU - Rui Amaral Lopes AU - Sarah O'Connell AU - Donal Finn AU - Maomao Hu AU - Humberto Queiroz AU - Dani Alexander AU - Andrew Satchwell AU - Doris Österreicher AU - Ben Polly AU - Alessia Arteconi AU - Flavia De Andrade Pereira AU - Monika Hall AU - Tuğçin Kırant-Mitić AU - Hanmin Cai AU - Hicham Johra AU - Hussain Kazmi AU - Rongling Li AU - Aaron Liu AU - Lorenzo Nespoli AU - Muhammad Hafeez Saeed AB -

This paper examines building energy flexibility at an aggregated level and addresses the main barriers and research gaps for the development of this resource across three design and development phases: market and policy, early planning and design, and operation. We review methodologies and tools and discuss barriers, challenges, and opportunities, incorporating policy, economic, technical, professional, and social perspectives. Although various legal and regulatory frameworks exist to foster the development of energy flexibility for small buildings, financing mechanisms are limited with a significant number of perceived risks undermining private investment. For the early planning and design phase, planners and designers lack appropriate tools and face interoperability challenges, which often results in insufficient consideration of demand response programs. The review of the operational phase highlighted the socio-technical challenges related to both the complexity of deployment and communication, as well as privacy and acceptability issues. Finally, the paper proposes a number of targeted research directions to address challenges and promote greater energy flexibility deployments, including capturing building demand side dynamics, improving baseline estimations and developing seamless connectivity between buildings and districts.

BT - Energy and Buildings DA - 12/2023 DO - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113608 N1 -

This is an open-access journal article published in Energy and Buildings and can be downloaded here

N2 -

This paper examines building energy flexibility at an aggregated level and addresses the main barriers and research gaps for the development of this resource across three design and development phases: market and policy, early planning and design, and operation. We review methodologies and tools and discuss barriers, challenges, and opportunities, incorporating policy, economic, technical, professional, and social perspectives. Although various legal and regulatory frameworks exist to foster the development of energy flexibility for small buildings, financing mechanisms are limited with a significant number of perceived risks undermining private investment. For the early planning and design phase, planners and designers lack appropriate tools and face interoperability challenges, which often results in insufficient consideration of demand response programs. The review of the operational phase highlighted the socio-technical challenges related to both the complexity of deployment and communication, as well as privacy and acceptability issues. Finally, the paper proposes a number of targeted research directions to address challenges and promote greater energy flexibility deployments, including capturing building demand side dynamics, improving baseline estimations and developing seamless connectivity between buildings and districts.

PB - Elsevier BV PY - 2023 EP - 113608 T2 - Energy and Buildings TI - Developing energy flexibility in clusters of buildings: A critical analysis of barriers from planning to operation UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113608 VL - 300 SN - 0378-7788 ER -