TY - JOUR KW - Climate change KW - Climate change mitigation AU - Felix Creutzig AU - Leila Niamir AU - Xuemei Bai AU - Max Callaghan AU - Jonathan M Cullen AU - Julio Díaz-José AU - Maria Figueroa AU - Arnulf Grubler AU - William F Lamb AU - Adrian Leip AU - Eric R Masanet AU - Érika Mata AU - Linus Mattauch AU - Jan C Minx AU - Sebastian Mirasgedis AU - Yacob Mulugetta AU - Sudarmanto Budi Nugroho AU - Minal Pathak AU - Patricia Perkins AU - Joyashree Roy AU - Stephane de la Rue du Can AU - Yamina Saheb AU - Shreya Some AU - Linda Steg AU - Julia Steinberger AU - Diana Urge-Vorsatz AB -

Mitigation solutions are often evaluated in terms of costs and greenhouse gas reduction potentials, missing out on the consideration of direct effects on human well-being. Here, we systematically assess the mitigation potential of demand-side options categorized into avoid, shift and improve, and their human well-being links. We show that these options, bridging socio-behavioural, infrastructural and technological domains, can reduce counterfactual sectoral emissions by 40–80% in end-use sectors. Based on expert judgement and an extensive literature database, we evaluate 306 combinations of well-being outcomes and demand-side options, finding largely beneficial effects in improvement in well-being (79% positive, 18% neutral and 3% negative), even though we find low confidence on the social dimensions of well-being. Implementing such nuanced solutions is based axiomatically on an understanding of malleable rather than fixed preferences, and procedurally on changing infrastructures and choice architectures. Results demonstrate the high mitigation potential of demand-side mitigation options that are synergistic with well-being.

BT - Nature Climate Change DA - 11/2021 DO - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01219-y LA - eng N2 -

Mitigation solutions are often evaluated in terms of costs and greenhouse gas reduction potentials, missing out on the consideration of direct effects on human well-being. Here, we systematically assess the mitigation potential of demand-side options categorized into avoid, shift and improve, and their human well-being links. We show that these options, bridging socio-behavioural, infrastructural and technological domains, can reduce counterfactual sectoral emissions by 40–80% in end-use sectors. Based on expert judgement and an extensive literature database, we evaluate 306 combinations of well-being outcomes and demand-side options, finding largely beneficial effects in improvement in well-being (79% positive, 18% neutral and 3% negative), even though we find low confidence on the social dimensions of well-being. Implementing such nuanced solutions is based axiomatically on an understanding of malleable rather than fixed preferences, and procedurally on changing infrastructures and choice architectures. Results demonstrate the high mitigation potential of demand-side mitigation options that are synergistic with well-being.

PY - 2021 T2 - Nature Climate Change TI - Demand-side solutions to climate change mitigation consistent with high levels of well-being UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-021-01219-y#citeas ER -