TY - JOUR KW - Commercial building KW - Simulation KW - Reference building KW - Cost-benefit KW - Energy efficiency standard AU - Shanguo Zhao AU - Wei Feng AU - Shicong Zhang AU - Jing Hou AU - Nan Zhou AU - Mark D Levine AB -
In this paper, a comprehensive comparison of the commercial building energy efficiency standard between the previous 2005 version and the new proposed version is conducted, including the energy efficiency analysis and cost-benefit analysis. To better understand the tech-economic performance of the new Chinese standard, energy models were set up based on a typical commercial office building in Chinese climate zones. The building energy standard in 2005 is used as the baseline for this analysis. Key building technologies measures are analyzed individually, including roof, wall, window, lighting and chiller and so on and finally whole building cost-benefit analysis was conducted. Results show that the new commercial building energy standard demonstrates good cost-effective performance, with whole building payback period around 4 years.
BT - Procedia Engineering C2 - LBNL-1005743 DA - 12/2015 DO - 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1074 N1 -The 9th International Symposium on Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (ISHVAC) joint with the 3rd International Conference on Building Energy and Environment (COBEE), 12-15 July 2015, Tianjin, China
N2 -In this paper, a comprehensive comparison of the commercial building energy efficiency standard between the previous 2005 version and the new proposed version is conducted, including the energy efficiency analysis and cost-benefit analysis. To better understand the tech-economic performance of the new Chinese standard, energy models were set up based on a typical commercial office building in Chinese climate zones. The building energy standard in 2005 is used as the baseline for this analysis. Key building technologies measures are analyzed individually, including roof, wall, window, lighting and chiller and so on and finally whole building cost-benefit analysis was conducted. Results show that the new commercial building energy standard demonstrates good cost-effective performance, with whole building payback period around 4 years.
PY - 2015 SP - 317 EP - 324 T2 - Procedia Engineering TI - Energy Savings and Cost-benefit Analysis of the New Commercial Building Standard in China VL - 121 ER -