We review the relationship between energy efficiency improvement measures and productivity in industry. We propose a method to include productivity benefits in the economic assessment of the potential for energy efficiency improvement. The paper explores the implications of how this change in perspective might affect the evaluation of energy-efficient technologies for a study of the iron and steel industry in the U.S. It is found that including productivity benefits explicitly in the modeling parameters would double the cost-effective potential for energy efficiency improvement, compared to an analysis excluding those benefits. We provide suggestions for future research for this important area.
BT - ACEEE's 2001 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry Proceedings, 7/24/2001 C1 -International Energy Studies Group
C2 - LBNL-49082 CN - LBNL-49082 DA - 07/2001 LA - eng M1 - 8 N2 -We review the relationship between energy efficiency improvement measures and productivity in industry. We propose a method to include productivity benefits in the economic assessment of the potential for energy efficiency improvement. The paper explores the implications of how this change in perspective might affect the evaluation of energy-efficient technologies for a study of the iron and steel industry in the U.S. It is found that including productivity benefits explicitly in the modeling parameters would double the cost-effective potential for energy efficiency improvement, compared to an analysis excluding those benefits. We provide suggestions for future research for this important area.
PY - 2001 T2 - ACEEE's 2001 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry Proceedings, 7/24/2001 T3 - ACEEE's 2001 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry - 7/24/2001 TI - Incorporating the productivity benefits into the assessment of cost effective energy savings potential using conservation supply curves VL - 1 ER -