TY - JOUR KW - Indoor environment department KW - Airflow and pollutant transport group KW - Atria KW - Indoor airflow and pollutant transport KW - Indoor pollutant dispersion KW - Mixed convection KW - Turbulence model AU - Buvaneswari Jayaraman AU - Elizabeth U Finlayson AU - Michael D Sohn AU - Tracy L Thatcher AU - Phillip N Price AU - Emily E Wood AU - Richard G Sextro AU - Ashok J Gadgil AB -
We compare computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions using a steady-state Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) model with experimental data on airflow and pollutant dispersion under mixed-convection conditions in a 7 x 9 x 11m high experimental facility. The Rayleigh number, based on height, was O(1011) and the atrium was mechanically ventilated. We released tracer gas in the atrium and measured the spatial distribution of concentrations; we then modeled the experiment using four different levels of modeling detail. The four computational models differ in the choice of temperature boundary conditions and the choice of turbulence model. Predictions from a low-Reynolds-number k- model with detailed boundary conditions agreed well with the data using three different model-measurement comparison metrics. Results from the same model with a single temperature prescribed for each wall also agreed well with the data. Predictions of a standard k- model were about the same as those of an isothermal model; neither performed well. Implications of the results for practical applications are discussed.
BT - Atmospheric Environment C1 -3
LA - eng M1 - 27 N2 -We compare computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions using a steady-state Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) model with experimental data on airflow and pollutant dispersion under mixed-convection conditions in a 7 x 9 x 11m high experimental facility. The Rayleigh number, based on height, was O(1011) and the atrium was mechanically ventilated. We released tracer gas in the atrium and measured the spatial distribution of concentrations; we then modeled the experiment using four different levels of modeling detail. The four computational models differ in the choice of temperature boundary conditions and the choice of turbulence model. Predictions from a low-Reynolds-number k- model with detailed boundary conditions agreed well with the data using three different model-measurement comparison metrics. Results from the same model with a single temperature prescribed for each wall also agreed well with the data. Predictions of a standard k- model were about the same as those of an isothermal model; neither performed well. Implications of the results for practical applications are discussed.
PY - 2006 SP - 5236 EP - 5250 T2 - Atmospheric Environment TI - Tracer Gas Transport under Mixed Convection Conditions in an Experimental Atrium: Comparison Between Experiments and CFD Predictions VL - 40 ER -