@article{30192,
  author = {Daniel L Wilson and Daniel R Talancon and Richard L Winslow and Xioranny Linares and Ashok J Gadgil},
  title = {Avoided emissions of a fuel-efficient biomass cookstove dwarf embodied emissions},
  abstract = {<p>Three billion people cook their food on biomass-fueled fires. This practice contributes to the anthropogenic radiative forcing. Fuel-efficient biomass cookstoves have the potential to reduce CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent emissions from cooking, however, cookstoves made from modern materials and distributed through energy-intensive supply chains have higher embodied CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent than traditional cookstoves. No studies exist examining whether lifetime emissions savings from fuel-efficient biomass cookstoves offset embodied emissions, and if so, by what margin. This paper is a complete life cycle inventory of “The Berkeley–Darfur Stove,” disseminated in Sudan by the non-profit Potential Energy. We estimate the embodied CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent in the cookstove associated with materials, manufacturing, transportation, and end-of-life is 17&nbsp;kg of CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent. Assuming a mix of 55% non-renewable biomass and 45% renewable biomass, five years of service, and a conservative 35% reduction in fuel use relative to a three-stone fire, the cookstove will offset 7.5 tonnes of CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent. A one-to-one replacement of a three-stone fire with the cookstove will save roughly 440 times more CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent than it “costs” to create and distribute. Over its five-year life, we estimate the total use-phase emissions of the cookstove to be 13.5 tonnes CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent, and the use-phase accounts for 99.9% of cookstove life cycle emissions. The dominance of use-phase emissions illuminate two important insights: (1) without a rigorous program to monitor use-phase emissions, an accurate estimate of life cycle emissions from biomass cookstoves is not possible, and (2) improving a cookstove's avoided emissions relies almost exclusively on reducing use-phase emissions even if use-phase reductions come at the cost of substantially increased non-use-phase emissions.</p>},
  year = {2016},
  journal = {Development Engineering},
  volume = {1},
  pages = {45 - 52},
  month = {06/2016},
  issn = {23527285},
  doi = {10.1016/j.deveng.2016.01.001},
  language = {eng},
}