@article{25112, keywords = {performance, material, ablation, laser, laser ablation, laser-ablation, analysis, time, beam, glass, glasses, icp ms, icp-ms, icpms, mass, mass spectrometry, mass-spectrometry, matrix, plasma, plasma mass spectrometry, plasma-mass-spectrometry, sample, samples, sampling, spectrometry, dependence, signal, single, pulsed laser, pulsed-laser, nm, laser beam, 213 nm, 213 nm laser ablation icp-ms, ablation icp-ms, ablation-icp-ms, accuracy, analytical performance, glass standard, glass standard reference materials, icp-ms analysis, laser ablation icp-ms, laser ablation icpms, laser-ablation-icp-ms, nist, nist glass, precision, reference material, reference materials, scan, series, standard, standard reference materials, strategies, strategy}, author = {Jhanis J Gonzalez and Alberto J Fernández and Xianglei Mao and Richard E Russo}, title = {Scanning vs. single spot laser ablation (213 nm) inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry}, abstract = {

Sampling strategy is defined in this work as the interaction of a repetitively pulsed laser beam with a fixed position on a sample (single spot) or with a moving sample (scan). Analytical performance of these sampling strategies was compared by using 213 nm laser ablation ICP-MS. A geological rock (Tuff) was quantitatively analyzed based on NIST series 610-616 glass standard reference materials. Laser ablation data were compared to ICP-MS analysis of the dissolved samples. The scan strategy (50 mmys) produced a flat, steady temporal ICP-MS response whereas the single spot strategy produced a signal that decayed with time (after 60 s). Single-spot sampling provided better accuracy and precision than the scan strategy when the first 15 s of the sampling time was eliminated from the data analysis. In addition, the single spot strategy showed less matrix dependence among the four NIST glasses.

}, year = {2004}, journal = {Spectrochim.Acta Pt.B-At.Spec.}, volume = {59}, pages = {369-374}, note = {

LBNL-56155 IN FILE

}, language = {eng}, }