@misc{22033,
  keywords = {Energy Markets and Policy Department, Energy Analysis and Environmental Impacts Division},
  author = {Julie G Osborn and Charles A Goldman and Terry E Singer and Nicole C Hopper},
  title = {Assessing U.S. ESCO Industry: Results from the NAESCO Database Project},
  abstract = {<p>The U.S. Energy Services Company (ESCO) industry is often cited as the most successful model for the private sector delivery of energy-efficiency services. This study documents actual performance of the ESCO industry in order to provide policymakers and investors with objective information and customers with a resource for benchmarking proposed projects relative to industry performance. We have assembled a database of nearly 1500 case studies of energy-efficiency projects – the most comprehensive data set of the U.S. ESCO industry available. These projects include $2.55B of work completed by 51 ESCOs and span much of the history of this industry. We estimate that the ESCO industry completed $1.8-2.1B of projects in 2000. The industry has grown rapidly over the last decade with revenues increasing at a 24% annualized rate. We compare typical project characteristics, energy savings, and economics in institutional and private sector market segments. ESCOs typically invested about $2.30/ft per project in various energy efficiency improvements, although there is large variation in project costs across market segments. We find that lighting-only projects report median electricity savings of 47% of targeted equipment consumption; the median for lighting-&amp;-non-lighting projects is 23% of the total electric bill baseline. Median simple payback time is seven years for institutional sector projects and three years in the private sector. We estimate direct economic benefits of $1.62 billion for the 1080 projects in our database with both cost and savings data. The median benefit/cost ratio is 2.1 for 309 private sector projects and 1.6 for 771 institutional sector projects. Finally, we discuss the role of enabling legislation and policies, including ratepayer-funded energy-efficiency programs, in encouraging ESCO industry growth.</p>},
  year = {2002},
  pages = {15},
  month = {08/2002},
  publisher = {LBNL},
  address = {Berkeley},
}